NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Larney v Johannson [2013] NSWCA 409 Hearing dates: 12 November 2013 Decision date: 09 December 2013 Before: Meagher JA at [1]; Barrett JA at [14]; Emmett JA at [21] Decision: 1. Leave to appeal be granted. 2. The appeal be dismissed with costs. Catchwords: APPEAL - civil - Dividing Fences Act 1991 - whether power under Act to order removal of fence - whether "fencing work" includes removal of fence - whether proper notice under s 11 was served by appellant owner requiring adjoining respondent owner to contribute to removal of fence erected by respondent owner - where respondent owner who erected fence initially served notices on appellant requiring contribution but then erected fence without seeking contribution - where respondent owner's fence determined to be a sufficient dividing fence - where appellant owner purported to apply under Act to remove fence Legislation Cited: Crown Lands Act 1989 Dividing Fences Act 1991 Fences Dividing Fences Act 1988 Local Government Act 1993 Supreme Court Act 1970, s 101(2)(r) Cases Cited: Alwiah v Watts [2004] NSWSC 948 Larney v Johannson [2012] NSWSC 1297 Texts Cited: Digest of Justinian 10.1 Justinian's Institutes 4.17.6 New South Wales Law Reform Commission, Dividing Fences Report 59, December 1988 - Community Law Reform Program: Dividing Fences Category: Principal judgment Parties: Ismail Larney (Appellant) Angela Johannson (Respondent) Representation: Counsel:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate