NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Bou-Antoun v R [2013] NSWCCA 305 Hearing dates: 23 October 2013 Decision date: 05 December 2013 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] Johnson J at [2] Latham J at [3] Decision: Application for extension of time within which to seek leave to appeal is refused. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - application for extension of time to appeal sentence - guilty plea - aggravated sexual assault (in company) and solicit to murder - unexplained and gross delay - provisional grant of legal aid on basis of Muldrock error ground - whether trial judge erred in finding aggravating factors - whether trial judge erred by failing to give effect to finding of special circumstances - whether trial judge fell into Muldrock error - whether sentence for solicit to murder offence and aggregate sentence manifestly excessive - trial judge erred in determining that actual or threatened violence was aggravating factor of solicit to murder offence - feature of offence that is inherent to offence cannot be taken into account as aggravating factor - no Muldrock error - no failure to give effect to finding of special circumstances - sentence not plainly unjust - whether error was material such as to warrant lesser sentence in law - no lesser sentence warranted in law - application refused Legislation Cited: Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Cases Cited: Abdul v R [2013] NSWCCA 247 Application by Chaouki Bou Antoun pursuant to s 78(1) Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 [2013] NSWSC 1540 Bou-Antoun v R [2008] NSWCCA 1 Louizos v R [2009] NSWCCA 71 Muldrock v R [2011] HCA 39 ; 244 CLR 120 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Kevin Bou-Antoun - (Applicant) Regina - (Crown Respondent) Representation: Counsel: C Bruce SC - (Applicant) M Cinque - (Crown Respondent) Solicitors: Andrew Harris & Associates - (Applicant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions - (Crown Respondent) File Number(s): 2004/12922 2005/15133 Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9101 Date of Decision: 2006-05-12 00:00:00 Before: Sorby DCJ File Number(s): 2004/12922 2005/15133
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate