NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: RD v R [2013] NSWCCA 306 Hearing dates: 22 November 2013 Decision date: 20 December 2013 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] Blanch J at [40] R A Hulme J at [41] Decision: Leave to appeal against sentence granted. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - application for leave to appeal against sentence - three offences of aggravated robbery with a dangerous weapon - whether sentencing judge erred in treating the fact that the offences were committed in company as an aggravating factor - whether double counting of this factor had occurred - alleged error not made out - alternatively, no lesser sentence is warranted in law. Legislation Cited: Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1987 Crimes Act 1900 - s97(2) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 - s 32 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Cases Cited: Hamze v R [2006] NSWCCA 36 Category: Principal judgment Parties: RD - Applicant Regina - Respondent Crown Representation: Counsel: Mr P Lange - Applicant Ms H Wilson SC - Respondent Crown Solicitors: Hanna Legal - Applicant S Kavanagh, Solicitor for Public Prosecutions - Respondent Crown File Number(s): 2010/309528 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2012-12-13 00:00:00 Before: Charteris SC DCJ File Number(s): 2010/309528
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate