NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Hunter (No. 2) [2013] NSWSC 1806 Hearing dates: 13 November 2013 Decision date: 06 December 2013 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Criminal Before: Johnson J Decision: 1. The objection by the Accused to the tender by the Crown of the contents of the statement of Wade Hunter dated 2 September 2011 is overruled. 2. The representations identified by the Crown in the statement of Wade Hunter dated 2 September 2011 satisfy the requirements of s.65(1) and (2) Evidence Act 1995. 3. The Accused's Notice of Motion filed on 28 October 2013 is dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - murder - pretrial application to exclude evidence - statement of witness who has since died - exception to hearsay rule where witness unavailable - whether requirements of s.65(2) Evidence Act 1995 satisfied - whether evidence should be excluded under s.137 Evidence Act 1995 - requirements of s.65(2) established - evidence should not be excluded under s.137 Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 Cases Cited: Festa v The Queen [2001] HCA 72; 208 CLR 593
Lee v The Queen [1998] HCA 60; 195 CLR 594 Papakosmas v The Queen [1999] HCA 37; 196 CLR 297 R v Ambrosoli [2002] NSWCCA 386; 55 NSWLR 603 R v Cook [2004] NSWCCA 52 R v El Masri [2010] NSWSC 1277 R v Shamouil [2006] NSWCCA 112; 66 NSWLR 228 R v Sio [2013] NSWSC 1412 R v Suteski [2002] NSWCCA 509; 56 NSWLR 182 Texts Cited: --- Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Regina (Crown) Paul Andrew Hunter (Accused) Representation: Counsel: Mr RA Herps (Crown) Mr DL Carroll (Accused) Solicitors: Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (Crown) Shiranica Danieli Lawyers (Accused) File Number(s): 2011/397367 Publication restriction: ---
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate