NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Palizio v NSW Parole Authority [2013] NSWSC 1829 Hearing dates: 02/12/2013 Decision date: 13 December 2013 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL Decision: Plaintiff's summons dismissed. Plaintiff's application under Court Suppression and Non-publication Orders Act 2010 (NSW) refused. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - Application under s69 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) - application to quash defendant's decision confirming revocation of parole of plaintiff - plaintiff goes to Western Australia in breach of parole conditions - plaintiff commits further offences in Western Australia - plaintiff sentenced to imprisonment in Western Australia - whether imprisonment in Western Australia counts towards service of parole period in NSW - meaning of s171(3) of the Crimes (Administration of Sentences) Act 1999 (NSW) - meaning of "taken into custody" and "at large" as used in section - whether decision of defendant manifestly unreasonable - whether defendant failed to have regard to a mandatory relevant consideration - plaintiff's summons dismissed - plaintiff's application under Court Suppression and Non-publication Orders Act 2010 (NSW) refused. Legislation Cited: Court Suppression and Non-publication Orders Act 2010 (NSW) Crimes (Administration of Sentences) Act 1999 (NSW) - s171(3) Interpretation Act 1987 (NSW) - s12(1) Prisoners (Interstate Transfer) Act 1982 (NSW) Service and Execution of Process Act 1992 (Cth) Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) - s69 Cases Cited: Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation - [1948] 1 KB 223 Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond [1990] HCA 33; 170 CLR 321 Callaghan v R [2006] NSWCCA 58; 160 A Crim R 145 Dempster v National Companies and Securities Commission [1993] 9 WAR 215 Fairfax Digital Australia and New Zealand Pty Ltd v Ibrahim [2012] NSWCCA 125; 293 ALR 384 Legal Services Board v Gillespie-Jones [2013] HCA 35; 87 ALJR 985 Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd [1986] HCA 40; 162 CLR 24 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li [2013] HCA 18; 297 ALR 225 Morrison v The Queen [2009] NSWCCA 211; 197 A Crim R 103 Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority [1998] HCA 28; 194 CLR 355 at 381 R v Adams [1935] HCA 62; 53 CLR 563 Re Bolton; Ex parte Beane [1987] HCA 12; 162 CLR 514 Secretary of State for Education and Science v Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council [1976] UKHL 6; [1977] AC 1014 Waterford v Commonwealth [1987] HCA 25; 163 CLR 54 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Bagio Palizio - Plaintiff New South Wales State Parole Authority - Defendant Attorney General for the State of New South Wales - Intervenor Representation: Counsel: Mr M Wise/Mr A Solomon-Bridge - Plaintiff Submitting Appearance - Defendant Mr J Hutton - Intervenor Solicitors: Arslan Lawyers - Plaintiff IV Knight, Crown Solicitor - Defendant IV Knight, Crown Solicitor - Intervenor File Number(s): 2013/355115
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate