NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: BLOOMFIELD, Gary v R [2013] NSWCCA 315 Hearing dates: 29 August 2013 Decision date: 11 December 2013 Before: Latham J at [1] Rothman J at [2] Davies J at [48] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal granted; (2) Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - sentence appeal - robbery in company - alleged misapplication of Henry guideline - alleged manifest excess - appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Cases Cited: BP v R [2010] NSWCCA 159; (2010) 201 A Crim R 379 Hili v The Queen; Jones v The Queen [2010] HCA 45; (2010) 242 CLR 520 Murchie v R [1999] NSWCCA 424; (1999) 108 A Crim R 482 Norbis v Norbis [1986] HCA 17; (1986) 161 CLR 513 R v Hemsley [2004] NSWCCA 228 R v Henry [1999] NSWCCA 111; (1999) 46 NSWLR 346 Tammer-Spence v R [2013] NSWCCA 297 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Gary Bloomfield (Applicant) Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: I Nash (Applicant) P G Ingram SC (Crown) Solicitors: Aboriginal Legal Service (NSW/ACT) Ltd (Applicant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Crown) File Number(s): 2011/205645 Publication restriction: None Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2012-05-03 00:00:00 Before: English DCJ File Number(s): 2011/205645
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate