NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Junge v Junge [2013] NSWSC 1842 Hearing dates: 22 October 2013 Decision date: 11 December 2013 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Darke J Decision: Parties to bring in Short Minutes Catchwords: TRUSTS - resulting trust - by provision of purchase money - no direct evidence of source of funds - assertions as to source of funds not contradicted - evidence sufficient to establish resulting trust
CONTRACT - negotiations between husband and wife in context of matrimonial dispute - whether concluded agreement reached - intention to create legal relations - binding agreement established
CONTRACT - promise made by A to B to ensure that interest in land becomes property of B or C - B predeceases A - whether agreement lapses - promise remains able to be performed - specific performance of promise
ESTOPPEL - promise made by A to B to ensure that upon death interest in land becomes property of B or C - A makes will inconsistent with promise - whether failure of C to complain about will gives rise to estoppel precluding enforcement of promise - no estoppel found Legislation Cited: Limitation Act 1969 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Cases Cited: Barns v Barns [2003] HCA 9; (2003) 214 CLR 169 Brambles Holdings Ltd v Bathurst City Council [2001] NSWCA 61; (2001) 53 NSWLR 153 Brown v New South Wales Trustee and Guardian [2012] NSWCA 431 Byrne v Australian Airlines Limited [1995] HCA 24;(1995) 185 CLR 410 Dalton v Ellis [2005] NSWSC 1252; (2005) 65 NSWLR 134 Delaforce v Simpson-Cook [2010] NSWCA 84; (2010) 78 NSWLR 483 Drummond v Registrar of Probates (SA) [1918] HCA 58; (1918) 25 CLR 318 Hendriks v McGeoch [2008] NSWCA 53 Integrated Computer Services Pty Ltd v Digital Equipment Corporation (Aust) Ltd (1988) 5 BPR 11,110 Maddock v Registrar of Titles (Vic)[1915] HCA 10; (1915) 19 CLR 681 Nguyen v Cosmopolitan Homes [2008] NSWCA 246 Varma v Varma [2010] NSWSC 786 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Theodor Linden Junge (Plaintiff) June Peggy Junge (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: M Gorrick (Plaintiff) D Liebhold (Defendant) Solicitors: Phillip Boyce & Associates (Plaintiff) Turner Freeman Lawyers (Defendant) File Number(s): 2012/116323 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate