NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Telstra Corporation Limited v Frontline Demolition NSW Pty Ltd [2013] NSWDC 241 Hearing dates: 4, 5 and 6 November 2013 Decision date: 15 November 2013 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: P Taylor SC DCJ Decision: (1) Judgment for the plaintiff against the first defendant in the sum of $54,677.72. (2) Judgment for the plaintiff against the second defendant in the sum of $54,677.73. (3) Costs reserved. Catchwords: NEGLIGENCE - breach of duty to take reasonable care - principal contractor and subcontractor - off-site removal of tree stump - presence of underground services - known to principal contractor - failure to warn - failure to investigate - inappropriate manner of removal - when a person becomes an employee - proportionate liability - apportionment of damage Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2002, s 3B, s 5B, s 34, s 34A Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, r 42.1 Cases Cited: Calliden Insurance Ltd v Fox [2009] HCA 35 Hamilton v Whitehead (1988) 166 CLR 121 Hollis v Vabu Pty Ltd [2001] HCA 44 Stevens v Brodribb Sawmilling Co Pty Ltd (1986) 160 CLR 16 Tesco Supermarkets Ltd v Nattrass [1972] AC 153 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Telstra Corporation Limited (ACN 051 775 556) (plaintiff) Frontline Demolition NSW Pty Ltd (ACN 124 788 138) (first defendant) Total Construction Pty Ltd (second defendant) Representation: Mr D P O'Dowd (plaintiff) Mr C P O'Neill (first defendant) Mr W Reynolds (second defendant) Sparke Helmore Lawyers (plaintiff) Lee & Lyons (first defendant) HWL Ebsworth Lawyers (second defendant) File Number(s): 2012/135999 Publication restriction: No
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate