NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Cao v Regina [2013] NSWCCA 321 Hearing dates: 09/12/2013 Decision date: 16 December 2013 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] Simpson J at [38] Hall J at [39] Decision: Leave to appeal granted. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - sentence appeal - supplying a prohibited drug and possession of firearms offences - whether sentence manifesting excessive - no specific error identified but accumulation of sentences challenged - no error of principle - appeal dismissed. Legislation Cited: Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 Cases Cited: Ayshow v R [2011] NSWCCA 240 Dinsdale v The Queen [2000] HCA 54; 202 CLR 321 House v The King [1936] HCA 40; 55 CLR 499 R v Amurao [2005] NSWCCA 32 R v Dusan Krstic [2005] NSWCCA 391 R v Najem [2008] NWCCA 32 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Van Vinh Cao - Applicant Regina - Respondent Crown Representation: Counsel: Mr G James QC/Mr W Chan - Applicant Ms V Lydiard - Crown Solicitors: Oxford Lawyers - Applicant S Kavanagh, Solicitor for Public Prosecutions - Respondent Crown File Number(s): 2012/42315 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2013-03-20 00:00:00 Before: Armitage DCJ File Number(s): 2012/42315
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate