NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Inspector Christensen v Abigroup Contractors Pty Limited and Anor [2013] NSWIRComm 111 Hearing dates: 15 to 18, 22, 23, 29 and 30 April 2013 Decision date: 20 December 2013 Before: Walton J, Vice-President Decision: (1) In Matter No IRC 278 of 2011, the Court finds the defendant, Abigroup Contractors Pty Ltd, not guilty of the offence as charged. The charge is dismissed; (2) In Matter No IRC 279 of 2011, the charge against the defendant, Abigroup Contractors Pty Ltd, has been proven with respect to particular (b). A defendant will be found guilty if only one of the particulars of a charge is made out: Environmental Protection Authority v Sydney Water Corporation Limited (1997) 98 LGERA 316; (1997) 98 A Crim R 481 at 485 per Gleeson CJ (Ireland and Bruce JJ agreeing) applied in O'Sullivan at [93]. Accordingly, the Court finds Abigroup Contractors Pty Ltd guilty of an offence under s 8(2) of the Act; (3) In Matter No IRC 285 of 2011, the Court finds the defendant, GTE Workplace Management Pty Ltd, not guilty of the offence as charged. The charge is dismissed; (4) Matter No IRC 279 of 2011 will be listed for sentencing at 10am on 4 March 2014; (5) The question of costs is reserved until judgment is delivered on sentence in Matter No IRC 279 of 2011; (6) There is liberty to apply upon the giving of reasonable notice with respect to orders (4) and (5). Catchwords: OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY - trial - two defendants - Abigroup Contractors Pty Ltd prosecuted under s 8(1) and s 8(2) of the Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000 - charges in relation to failures to conduct risk assessment in respect of a particular (changed) work process and maintain safe system of work - GTE Workplace Management Pty Ltd prosecuted under s 8(1) of the Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000 - charge in relation to failures to assess risks, review risk assessments and instruct employees - both defendants entered pleas of not guilty - prosecutions arose from fatal incident in course of work involving the installation of rail panels - various subcontractors engaged at site - rail panels lifted into place via crane - switch panel misaligned - rectification work undertaken by workers on panel whilst panel still under weight of crane - head dogman/rigger and crane operator aware panel under weight - no person at the site other than crane operator and head rigger/dogman aware - tension from panel being under weight caused rails to come loose when clips attaching rails to panel removed by labourers - one worker killed - four workers injured
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate