NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Gloxinia Investments Limited v Low & Anor [2013] NSWSC 1889 Hearing dates: 18 and 20 November 2013 Decision date: 17 December 2013 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Young AJ Decision: Statement of claim dismissed. Catchwords: CONTRACTS - Termination - Remedies - Where contract allowed vendor to elect between remedies upon termination of contract - Where election made "without prejudice" - Whether election effective
CONTRACTS - Construction - Condition precedent - Where contract required vendor to install certain items prior to completion - Whether clause a condition precedent to completion Cases Cited: Alexus Pty Ltd v Pont Holdings Pty Ltd [2000] NSWSC 1171; (2000) 10 BPR 18,371 Beaumont v Dukes (1821) Jac 422; 37 ER 910 Golding v Vella [2001] NSWSC 567; (2001) 10 BPR 18,919 Haynes v Hirst (1927) 27 SR (NSW) 480 Heyman v Darwins Ltd [1942] AC 356 Honner v Ashton (1979) 1 BPR 9,478 Immer (No 145) Pty Ltd v Uniting Church in Australia Property Trust (NSW) [1993] HCA 27; (1993) 182 CLR 26 McNally v Waitzer [1981] 1 NSWLR 294 McTier v Haupt [1992] 1 VR 653 Re Ronim Pty Ltd [1998] QCA 444; [1999] 2 Qd R 172 Sargent v ASL Developments Ltd [1974] HCA 40; (1974) 131 CLR 634 Shevill v Builders Licensing Board (1980) 2 BPR 9,662 Shevill v Builders Licensing Board [1982] HCA 47; (1982) 149 CLR 620 Tiplady v Gold Coast Carlton Pty Ltd [1984] FCA 152; (1984) 3 FCR 426 Tricontinental Corporation Ltd v HDFI Ltd (1990) 21 NSWLR 689 Union Eagle Ltd v Golden Achievement Ltd [1997] AC 515 Williams v Brisco (1882) 22 Ch D 441 Texts Cited: Conveyancing Service New South Wales (LexisNexis Butterworths, Looseleaf) Sir Edward Fry, A Treatise on the Specific Performance of Contracts (Stevens & Sons, 6th edn, 1921) N C Seddon, R A Bigwood and M P Ellinghouse, Cheshire and Fifoot Law of Contract (LexisNexis Butterworths, 10th Aust edn, 2012) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Gloxinia Investments Limited (Plaintiff) Vincent Hock Seng Low (First defendant) Rena Oiu Tsin Low (Second defendant) Representation: Counsel: A R R Vincent (Plaintiff) J C Giles/C W Brown (Defendant) Solicitors: Norton Rose Australia (Plaintiff) TressCox Lawyers (Defendants) File Number(s): 2012/210819 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate