NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Workplace Safety Australia Pty Limited v Simple OHS Solutions Pty Limited [2013] NSWSC 1936 Hearing dates: 18 November to 21 November and 26 November 2013 Decision date: 11 December 2013 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Rein J Decision: Judgment for cross-claimants against the cross-defendants in the amount of $208, 177.39 (plus interest calculated on the basis of Practice Note SC Gen 16). Judgment for defendant on plaintiff's claim Catchwords: CONTRACT - whether the defendant's failure to obtain 15 new customers per month over a six month period ("minimum customer requirement") and the failure to pay an instalment amount were breaches of the Distribution Agreement ("the Agreement") entitling the plaintiff to terminate; whether clause 2(c) of the Agreement required payment by a Saturday and whether, if it did, time for payment was essential permitting termination for non-payment without notice TRADE AND COMMERCE - whether the Agreement was a franchise agreement subject to the Franchising Code of Conduct ("FCC") and hence whether the defendants contravened s 51AD of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) and the FCC ESTOPPEL - whether the defendant was estopped from relying on the FCC and breaches by the plaintiff ESTOPPEL - whether the plaintiff was estopped from relying on the breach of the minimum customer requirement Legislation Cited: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) Cases Cited: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) v Kyloe Pty Ltd [2007] ATPR 42-194; [2007] FCA 1522 Barilla v James (1964) 81 WN (pt 1) (NSW) 457 Capital Networks Pty Ltd v .Au Domain Administration Limited [2004] FCA 808 Equititrust Ltd v Franks [2009] NSWCA 128 Franks v Equitiloan Security Pty Ltd (No 2) [2008] NSWSC 33 Kell & Rigby Pty Ltd v Flurrie Pty Ltd [2006] NSWSC 906 Kok Hoong v Leong Cheong Kweng Mines Ltd [1964] AC 993 Master Education Services v Ketchell (2008) 236 CLR 101, (2008) 249 ALR 44 Overmyer Industrial Brokers Pty Ltd v Campbells Cash & Carry Pty Ltd [2003] NSWCA 305 Rafferty v Madgwicks; Time 2000 Systems (Aust) Pty Ltd v Rafferty (2012) 203 FCR 1, [2012] FCAFC 37 St Alder v Waverly Council [2010] NSWCA 22 Tudor Developments Pty Ltd v Makeig (2008) 72 NSWLR 624, [2008] NSWCA 263 Wallace-Smith v Thiess Infraco (Swanston) Pty Ltd (2005) 218 ALR 1; [2005] FCAFC 49 Texts Cited: Lewison and Hughes Interpretation of Contracts, 1st ed (1989) Sweet and Maxwell Seddon et al Cheshire & Fifoot Law of Contract (Australian Edition) 10th (2012) LexisNexis Buttersworths Category: Principal judgment Parties: Workplace Safety Australia Pty Limited (plaintiff / first cross defendant) Simple OHS Solutions Pty Limited (first defendant/ first cross claimant) Sue Louise Bottrell (second defendant/ second cross claimant) Kim Kerri Ann Schekeloff (second cross defendant) Representation: Counsel: T. Alexis SC and Z. Steggall (plaintiff/first and second cross defendants) M. Ashhurst SC and L. Corbett (first and second defendants/ first and second cross claimants) Solicitors: Von Muenster Solicitors & Attorneys (plaintiff and first and second cross defendants) Cara Marasco & Co (first and second defendants/ first and second cross claimants) File Number(s): 2012/106183
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate