NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: LP v Regina [2013] NSWCCA 330 Hearing dates: 9 September 2013 Decision date: 23 December 2013 Before: Beazley P at [1] McCallum J at [2] Schmidt J at [101] Decision: Appeal dismissed Catchwords: CRIME - appeal against conviction - where appellant acquitted during trial on four counts of sexual assault and then convicted on remaining five counts - whether verdicts unreasonable - whether evidence of an alleged admission to the complainant's husband should have been excluded under s 137 of the Evidence Act - whether evidence of statements by mother of complainant excluded by consent ought to have been admitted Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Cases Cited: M v R [1994] HCA 63; (1994) 181 CLR 487 MFI v R [2002] HCA 53; (2002) 213 CLR 606 Prasad v R (1979) 2 A Crim R 45 R v SKA [2009] NSWCCA 186 R v TK [2009] NSWCCA 151; (2009) 74 NSWLR 299 Category: Principal judgment Parties: LP (appellant) Regina Representation: Counsel: C Loukas SC (appellant) V Lydiard (Crown) Solicitors: Legal Aid NSW (appellant) Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown) File Number(s): 2009/5106 Publication restriction: None Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2012-09-21 00:00:00 Before: Norrish DCJ File Number(s): 2009/5106
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate