NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Stojanovski v R [2013] NSWCCA 334 Hearing dates: 3 December 2013 Decision date: 20 December 2013 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1]; Simpson J at [2]; Johnson J at [47] Decision: (i) Leave to appeal each sentence granted; (ii) Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal - sentence - severity - pleas of guilty - supply prohibited drugs - cannabis and methylamphetamine - possession of a prohibited weapon - whether sentencing judge erred when determining objective seriousness of offending - whether sentencing judge erred in failing to take into account quantity of drugs involved in supply - whether sentencing judge failed to take into account remorse shown by applicant - whether sentence manifestly inadequate - no error found - leave to appeal each sentence granted - appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 Weapons Prohibition Act 1998 Cases Cited: Cherdchoochatri v R [2013] NSWCCA 118; 277 FLR 126 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Bill Stojanovski (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: T Edwards (Applicant) T Smith (Respondent) Solicitors: Nyman Gibson Stewart (Applicant) S Kavanagh - Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): 2011/143085 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2012-12-11 00:00:00 Before: Maiden DCJ File Number(s): 2011/143085
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate