NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Riva NSW Pty Limited v Key Nominees Pty Limited [2013] NSWSC 1952 Hearing dates: 6 December 2013 Decision date: 20 December 2013 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Young AJ Decision: Statement of Claim struck out. To be repleaded by 4 March 2014. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - Strike-out application - Statement of claim includes definitions section with pleadings of fact - Embarrassment.
RES JUDICATA - Want of prosecution - second suit for same claim - Where first suit brought by plaintiff dismissed for want of prosecution - Whether res judicata where no hearing on the merits - Whether abuse of process. Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Cases Cited: Andresakis & Skouteris v Alexus Holdings Pty Ltd [2006] NSWCA 294; (2006) 68 NSWLR 507 (CA) AON Risk Services Australia Ltd v Australian National University [2009] HCA 27; (2009) 239 CLR 175 Batistatos v Roads and Traffic Authority of New South Wales [2006] HCA 27; (2006) 226 CLR 256 Birkett v James [1978] AC 297 Clark v State of New South Wales [2006] NSWSC 673; (2006) 66 NSWLR 640 Day v Rogers [2011] NSWCA 124 General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) [1964] HCA 69 (1964) 112 CLR 125 Jeffery Katauskas Pty Ltd v SST Consulting Pty Ltd [2009] HCA 43; (2009) 239 CLR 75 Jeray v Blue Mountains City Council (No 2) [2010] NSWCA 367; (2010) 180 LGERA 1 Sali v SPC Ltd [1993] HCA 47; (1993) 116 ALR 625 Texts Cited: K R Handley, Spencer Bower Turner and Handley The Doctrine of Res Judicata (Butterworths, 4th edn 2009) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Riva (NSW) Pty Limited (First Plaintiff) Angelo Ferella and Gustava Ferella (Second Plaintiff) Agusta Pty Limited (Third Plaintiff) Key Nominees Pty Limited (First Defendant) Chris Stomo (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: A E Maroya/R Raffell (Plaintiffs) R A Parsons (First defendant) Solicitors: Bray Jackson & Co (First defendant) Moray & Agnew (Second defendant) File Number(s): 2012/173688 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate