NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Pet Tech Pty Ltd v Batson [2013] NSWSC 1954 Hearing dates: 29 October 2013 Decision date: 20 December 2013 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Young AJ Decision: Statement of Claim dismissed Catchwords: CONTRACTS - Construction - Clause reversing onus of proof - Whether clause valid - Whether clause an ouster of court's jurisdiction.
EMPLOYMENT - Restraint of trade - Confidential Information - Where plaintiff's evidence lacks specificity - Where confidential information not identified Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Cases Cited: Bond v Rees Corporate Advisory Pty Ltd [2013] VSCA 13 Cactus Imaging Pty Ltd v Peters [2006] NSWSC 717; (2006) 71 NSWLR 9 Corrs Pavey Whiting & Byrne v Collector of Customs (Vic) (1987) 14 FCR 434 Czarnikow & Co Ltd v Roth Schmidt & Co [1922] 2 KB 478 Dobbs v The National Bank of Australasia Ltd [1935] HCA 49; (1935) 53 CLR 643 General Billposting Company Ltd v Atkinson [1909] AC 118 Ex parte Young; In Re Kitchin (1881) 17 Ch D 668 Globex Foreign Exchange Corporation v Kelcher McLean (2011) 337 DLR (4th) 207 Hammerax Hi-Tech Pty Ltd v O'Donnell [2001] NSWSC 634 Kaufman v McGillicuddy (1914) 19 CLR 1 Novamaze Pty Ltd v Cut Price Deli Pty Ltd (1995) 128 ALR 540 Shomat Pty Ltd v Rubinstein (1995) 124 FLR 284 Texts Cited: Francis Dawson, "Survival of Restraint of Trade Clauses" (2013) 129 Law Quarterly Review 508 GL Williams, Joint Obligations (Butterworths, 1949) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Pet Tech Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) David Batson (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: LR Young (Plaintiff) Y Shariff (Defendant) Solicitors: Emil Ford Lawyers (Plaintiff) Holding Redlich (Defendant) File Number(s): 2012/270501 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate