NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Loh v R [2013] NSWCCA 339 Hearing dates: 12 December 2013 Decision date: 12 December 2013 Before: Ward JA at [1] Harrison J at [2] R A Hulme J at [3] Decision: 1. Leave to appeal granted. 2. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - sentence appeal - parity - supply large commercial quantity of heroin - co-offender received substantially lesser sentence - similar subjective circumstances - applicant had greater level of involvement in offence - no justifiable sense of grievance Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) Drugs Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW) England v R; Phanith v R [2009] NSWCCA 274 Jimmy v R [2010] NSWCCA 60; (2010) 77 NSWLR 540 McMullen v R [2013] NSWCCA 261 Cases Cited: Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; 244 CLR 120 R v Way [2004] NSWCCA 131; (2004) 60 NSWLR 168 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Lawrence Yong Shun Loh (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr W Chan (Applicant) Ms H Wilson SC (Crown) Solicitors: Audix Legal Solicitor for Public Prosecutions File Number(s): 2009/157013 Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9101 Date of Decision: 2010-10-28 00:00:00 Before: Bennett SC DCJ File Number(s): 2009/157013
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate