NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Rita Cameron v Walker Legal [2013] NSWSC 1985 Hearing dates: 13 December 2012 Decision date: 31 December 2013 Before: Harrison J Decision: 1. In proceedings number 2012/293348 the summons is dismissed with costs. 2. In proceedings number 2012/328671 the summons is dismissed with costs. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - costs - application for leave to appeal from determination of Costs Review Panel - where jurisdiction vested in District Court - where application otherwise without merit - application for judicial review of decision by Manager, Costs Assessment refusing application for extension of time to apply for review by Costs Review Panel - where no basis shown to interfere with original decision - proceedings dismissed with costs Legislation Cited: Legal Profession Act 1987 Legal Profession Act 2004 Supreme Court Act 1970 Cases Cited: Cameron v Qantas Airways Ltd [2008] NSWCA 275 Cameron v Qantas Airways Ltd [2010] NSWSC 899 Cameron v Qantas Airways Ltd [2011] NSWSC 178 Cameron V Qantas Airways Ltd [2011] NSWCA 258 Cameron v Qantas Airways Ltd [2011] NSWSC 1137 Cameron v Qantas Airways Ltd [2011] NSWSC 1138 Cameron v Qantas Airways Ltd [2011] NSWSC 1498 George Nassour v Anthony Mark Malouf [2011] NSWSC 356 Kioa v West [1985] HCA 81; (1985) 159 CLR 550 Levy v Bergseng [2008] NSWSC 294; (2008) 72 NSWLR 178 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Rita Cameron (Plaintiff) Stephen James Walker (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: S G Moffet (Defendant) Solicitors: Yeldham Price O'Brien Lusk (Defendant) File Number(s): 2012/293348, 2012/328671 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate