NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Connell v Santos NSW Pty Limited [2014] NSWLEC 1 Hearing dates: 18 December 2013 Decision date: 10 January 2014 Jurisdiction: Class 5 Before: Preston CJ Decision: Orders as set out at [174] - [178] Catchwords: ENVIRONMENTAL OFFENCES - failure to report spill incident that threatened material harm to the environment and failures to accurately report compliance against petroleum operations plan - defendant subsequently subject to corporate takeover and under new management - sentencing - objective circumstances of the offence - low level of environmental harm - risk of harm to the environment clearly foreseeable - practical measures could and should have been taken to prevent harm - defendant had control over causes that gave rise to the offences - subjective circumstances of case and mitigating factors - prior conviction for offence other than an environmental offence - defendant, as currently constituted, of good character - remorse demonstrated - plea of guilty entered at first available opportunity - defendant entitled to lesser penalty on basis that it provided assistance to prosecutor in relation to investigation of offence and conduct of the proceedings - purposes of sentencing - need for general deterrence but not specific deterrence - first prosecutions under the relevant statutory provision - consideration of need for consistency in sentencing - defendant convicted of offences as charged - fines imposed - defendant to pay prosecutor's costs and moiety orders made Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 ss 3A, 21A, 22, 23 Crimes Act 1990 s 316 Fines Act 1996 s 122 Interpretation Act 1987 s 30 Petroleum (Onshore) Act 1991 ss 3, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 21, 23, 74, 75, 77, 136A Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 sch 2 Cases Cited: Axer Pty Ltd v Environment Protection Authority (1993) 113 LGERA 357 Bentley v BGP Properties Pty Ltd [2006] NSWLEC 34; (2006) 145 LGERA 234 Camilleri's Stock Feeds Pty Ltd v Environment Protection Authority (1993) 32 NSWLR 683 Chief Executive of the Office of Environment and Heritage v Rinaldo (Nino) Lani [2012] NSWLEC 115 Elias v R; Issa v R [2013] HCA 31; (2013) 298 ALR 637 Environment Protection Authority v Caltex Australia Petroleum Pty Ltd [2007] NSWLEC 647 Environment Protection Authority v Centennial Newstan Pty Ltd [2006] NSWLEC 732 Environment Protection Authority v Djura [2012] NSWLEC 122 Environment Protection Authority v Hargreaves (No 2) [2003] NSWLEC 15; (2003) 124 LGERA 57 Environment Protection Authority v Peters [2006] NSWLEC 612; (2006) 153 LGERA 238 Environment Protection Authority v Waste Recycling and Processing Corporation [2006] NSWLEC 419; (2006) 148 LGERA 299 Garrett v Williams [2006] NSWLEC 785; (2006) 160 LGERA 115 Gittany Constructions Pty Ltd v Sutherland Shire Council [2006] NSWLEC 242; (2006) 145 LGERA 189 Hili v The Queen [2010] HCA 45; (2010) 242 CLR 520 LB v R [2013] NSWCCA 70 Minister for Planning v Moolarben Coal Mines Pty Ltd [2010] NSWLEC 147; (2010) 175 LGERA 93 Nash v Eastern Star Gas Ltd [2012] NSWIRComm 75 R v Ellis (1986) 6 NSWLR 603 R v Holder [1983] 3 NSWLR 245 R v Johnson [2004] NSWCCA 76 R v MAK; R v MSK [2006] NSWCCA 381; (2006) 167 A Crim R 159 R v McNaughton [2006] NSWCCA 242; (2006) 66 NSWLR 566 R v Olbrich [1999] HCA 54; (1999) 199 CLR 270 R v Rushby [1977] 1 NSWLR 594 R v Shankley [2003] NSWCCA 253 R v Thomson; R v Houlton [2000] NSWCCA 309; (2000) 49 NSWLR 383 R v Wickham [2004] NSWCCA 193 Raad v R [2011] NSWCCA 138; (2011) 220 A Crim R 471 Veen v R (No 2) [1988] HCA 14; (1988) 164 CLR 465 Texts Cited: A Ashworth, Sentencing and Criminal Justice (4th ed, Cambridge University Press, 2005) S J Odgers SC, Sentence (Longueville Books, 2012) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Rachel Connell (Prosecutor) Santos NSW Pty Ltd (Defendant) Representation: Mr S J Rushton SC with Ms S G Callan (Prosecutor) Mr D Jordan SC with Ms K J Edwards (Defendant) Crown Solicitor's Office (Prosecutor) Ashurst Australia (Defendant) File Number(s): 50435-50438 of 2013 Publication restriction: No
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate