NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Hancock v Rinehart [2013] NSWSC 1998 Hearing dates: 3 December 2013 Decision date: 03 December 2013 Jurisdiction: Equity Division - Corporations List Before: Brereton J Decision: Orders for discovery and the issuing of subpoenas. Catchwords: PROCEDURE - Discovery - Notices to produce - Subpoenas - consideration of relevance. Legislation Cited: (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 r 21.3(3)(b) Cases Cited: Murex Diagnostics Australia Pty Ltd v Chiron Corporation, (1995) 55 FCR 194, 128 ALR 525 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: John Langley Hancock (first plaintiff) Bianca Hope Rinehart (second plaintiff) Gina Hope Rinehart (first defendant) Ginia Hope Frances Rinehart (second defendant) Hope Rinehart Welker (third defendant) Hancock Prospecting Pty Ltd (fourth defendant) Hope Downs Iron Ore Pty Ltd (fifth defendant) Representation: Counsel: C Withers w A Hochroth (plaintiffs) B McClintock SC w C Bova (first defendant) P Flynn (second defendant) M Deutsch (solicitor) (third defendant) D Studdy SC w I Colquhoun (fourth & fifth defendants) Solicitors: Yeldham Price O'Brien Lusk (plaintiffs) Corrs Chambers Westgarth (first, fourth, fifth defendants) Gadens Lawyers (second defendant) Deutsch Miller (third defendant) File Number(s): 2011/285907
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate