NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: West v Director-General, NSW Ministry of Health in respect of Western Sydney Local Health District [2014] NSWIRComm 1001 Hearing dates: 6 December 2013 Decision date: 10 January 2014 Jurisdiction: Industrial Relations Commission Before: Newall C Decision: Motion upheld. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: Public sector disciplinary appeal - application for summary dismissal of appeal - asserted exclusion of appellant by effect of s.92(1)(b) of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 - principles of statutory interpretation - industrial instrument - literal meaning of statute - circumstances in which statute can be construed to be ineffective - obligation to give effect to statute where possible - preferred interpretation of subs.92(1)(b) - appeal excluded by s.92(1)(b) - motion upheld - appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Government and Related Employees Appeal Tribunal Act 1980 Health Services Act 1997 s.116A Industrial Relations Act 1996 s.8, s.91, s.92, subs.92(1)(b), s.98 Interpretation Act 1987 s.33 Cases Cited: Annetts v McCann (1990) 170 CLR 596 Australian Postal Corporation v Sinnaiah (2013) 213 FCR 449 Bull v Attorney-General (NSW) (1913) 17 CLR 370 Certain Lloyd's Underwriters and Underwriters Subscribing to contract No IHOOAAQS v Cross (2012) 293 ALR 412 Director-General of the Department of Corrective Services v Mitchelson (1992) 26 NSWLR 648 at 654 Director-General of Education v Suttling (1986) 162 CLR 427 Goundar v Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs (1994) 54 FCR 300 Momcilovic v The Queen (2011) 245 CLR 1 Newcastle City Council v GIO General Ltd (1997) 191 CLR 85 Project Blue Sky v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355 R v Young [1999] 46 NSWLR 681 Rail Corporation of NSW v Brown [2012] NSWCA 296 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mr Robert West - Applicant Director-General, NSW Ministry of Health - Respondent Representation: Mr D Chin (Applicant) Mr M Kimber SC, Mr O Fagir (Respondent) Petrine Costigan Lawyers - Applicant Messrs Maddocks - Respondent File Number(s): IRC 151 of 2013
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate