NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Meriton Property Services Pty Limited v Minister for Planning and Infrastructure [2013] NSWLEC 1260 Hearing dates: 11, 12 & 13 December 2013 Decision date: 16 December 2013 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Moore SC at [1] and [113] Pearson C at [73] Decision: See para [114] Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT MODIFICATION - Part 3A Project - Tests for jurisdiction - Merits of application PLANNING PRINCIPLE - First element of planning principle in Super Studio v Waverley Council superseded by Davies v Penrith City Council - Second element in Super Studio remains Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Interpretation Act 1987 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Willoughby Local Environmental Plan 2012 Cases Cited: Barrick Australia v Williams [2009] NSWCA 275; (2009) 74 NSWLR 733 Davies v Penrith City Council [2013] NSWLEC 1141 Moto Projects (No 2) Pty Limited v North Sydney Council [1999] NSWLEC 280; (1999) 106 LGERA 298 North Sydney Council v Michael Standley and Associates Pty Limited (1998) 97 LGERA 433 Pafburn v North Sydney Council [2005] NSWLEC 91 Project Blue Sky v Australian Broadcasting Authority [1998] HCA 28; (1998) 194 CLR 355 Super Studio v Waverley Council [2004] NSWLEC 91 Vacik Pty Limited v Penrith City Council (Stein J, unreported February 1992) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Meriton Property Services Pty Limited (Applicant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate