NSW Caselaw
Local Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Office of State Revenue v El Kazzi (No. 2) [2013] NSWLC 19 Hearing dates: 13-14/02/2013 Decision date: 02 September 2013 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Favretto LCM Decision: CANs 1, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9 and 10 are duplicitous Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - practice and procedure - duplicity - statutory provisions referring to a singular prohibited act - whether impermissible to charge more than one prohibited act in a Court Attendance Notice Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 First Home Owner Grant Act 2000 Oaths Act 1900 Taxation Administration Act 1996 Cases Cited: Chapman v R [2013] NSWCCA 91 Giam v R [1999] NSWCCA 53; (1999) 104 A Crim R 416 Johnson v Miller (1937) 59 CLR 467; [1938] ALR 104 Office of State Revenue v El Kazzi (No. 1) [2013] NSWLC 18 Romeyko v Samuels (1972) 2 SASR 529; (1972) 19 FLR 322 S v The Queen [1989] HCA 66; (1989) 168 CLR 266 Stanton v Abernathy (1990) 19 NSWLR 656; (1900) 48 A Crim R 16 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Office of State Revenue (prosecution/ respondent) Grace El Kazzi (accused/ applicant) Representation: P Wass SC for the OSR B Thomson of the NSW Crown Solicitor's Office for the OSR D Miralis of Gibson Nyman Stewart for the accused File Number(s): 2012/205920 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate