NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Twaddell v New South Wales Land and Housing Corporation [2014] NSWSC 7 Hearing dates: 22 November 2012; further written submissions by leave closed 23 January 2014 Decision date: 31 January 2014 Before: McCallum J Decision: Orders made in the nature of certiorari quashing the decisions purporting to cancel the plaintiff's rental rebate and purporting to require the plaintiff to pay a debt of $12,235.79 to the Corporation; order made in the nature of prohibition prohibiting the defendant from acting upon the purported cancellation decision or the purported debt decision; defendant ordered to pay the plaintiff's costs as agreed or assessed. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - Housing Act - decision to cancel rental rebate - whether power to make decision lawfully exercised - jurisdictional requirement to conduct an investigation under section 58 - whether satisfied Legislation Cited: Housing Act 2001 Supreme Court Act 1970 Cases Cited: Lafu v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2009) 112 ALD1; [2009] FCAFC 140 New South Wales Land and Housing Corporation v Navazi [2013] NSWCA 431 R v Secretary of State for the Home Department; ex parte Venables [1998] AC 407 Telstra Corporation v Australian Competition Tribunals (2009) 175 FCR 201 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Tanya Twaddell (plaintiff) New South Wales Land and Housing Corporation (defendant) Representation: Counsel: M Robinson SC, J Gumbert (plaintiff) J Smith, V McWilliam (defendant) Solicitors: Legal Aid NSW (plaintiff) NSW Land and Housing Corporation (defendant) File Number(s): 2012/103201 Publication restriction: None
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate