NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: R v Jagurdzia [2014] NSWCCA 3 Hearing dates: 5 February 2014 Decision date: 07 February 2014 Before: Simpson J, Hall J, Schmidt J Decision: 1. The Crown's appeal is upheld. It is noted the respondent's appeal has been withdrawn. 2. The sentence is quashed. 3. The matter is remitted to the District Court for re-sentence. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - Crown appeal - sentence imposed contrary to law - non-parole period - released to parole without serving minimum period in custody - appeal allowed - matter referred to District Court for re-sentence Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Cases Cited: Hili v R [2010] HCA 45; (2010) 242 CLR 520 Muldrock v R [2011] HCA 39; (2011) 244 CLR 120 O'Neil-Shaw v The Queen [2010] NSWCCA 42 Power v R [1974] HCA 26; (1974) 131 CLR 623 Regina v Pamplin [2001] NSWCCA 327 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Regina Elmir Jagurdzia Representation: Counsel: Ms J Girdham SC (Crown) Mr D Woodbury (Respondent) Solicitors: S Kavanagh - Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Crown) J Taylor (Respondent) File Number(s): 2012/36554 Publication restriction: None Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2013-09-12 00:00:00 Before: Craigie DCJ File Number(s): 2012/365554
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate