NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Armidale Dumaresq Council v Vorhauer (No 2) [2014] NSWLEC 7 Hearing dates: 4 February 2014 Decision date: 04 February 2014 Jurisdiction: Class 4 Before: Pepper J Decision: Application dismissed. Catchwords: BIAS: application by respondent for judge to recuse herself on the grounds of actual and apprehended bias - judge appeared against respondent in an unrelated matter over a decade ago while counsel - application dismissed. Cases Cited: Armidale Dumaresq Council v Vorhauer [2012] NSWLEC 154
Bakarich v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2010] NSWCA 43
Barakat v Goritsas (No 2) [2012] NSWCA 36
Duncan v Ipp [2013] NSWCA 189
Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy [2000] HCA 63; (2000) 205 CLR 337
Johnson v Johnson [2000] HCA 48; (2000) 201 CLR 488
Michael Wilson & Partners Ltd v Nicholls [2011] HCA 48; (2011) 244 CLR 427
R v Vorhauer [2002] NSWCCA 483
Raybos Australia Pty Ltd v Tectran Corporation Pty Ltd (1986) 6 NSWLR 272
Re JRL; Ex parte CJL [1986] HCA 36; (1986) 161 CLR 342 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Armidale Dumaresq Council (Applicant) Florence Amelia Vorhauer (Respondent) Representation: Mr David Clifton (Solicitor) (Applicant) Mrs Florence Vorhauer (in person) (Respondent) Clifton Legal (Applicant) N/A (Respondent) File Number(s): 40222 of 2012
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate