NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Attorney General of New South Wales v Rahman [2014] NSWSC 42 Hearing dates: 28 November 2012 Decision date: 10 February 2014 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Adams J Decision: (1) Mr Rahman is prohibited from instituting proceedings in New South Wales without first obtaining leave of the Court; (2) no further steps are to be taken by Mr Rahman in any proceeding already instituted by him in New South Wales without leave of the Court; (3) all proceedings already instituted by Mr Rahman in New South Wales are stayed pending leave of the Court to proceed; (4) the defendant is to pay the plaintiff's costs. Catchwords: PROCEDURE - application for vexatious proceedings order pursuant to s 8 of the Vexatious Proceedings Act 2008 - whether proceedings are vexatious - whether proceedings were instituted or conducted frequently - repeated re-litigation of issues determined against the defendant Legislation Cited: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth), s 44 Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth), s 5 Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 (NSW) Industrial Relations Act 1996 (NSW), s 84 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), s 39B, 78 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), ss 84, 101 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 14.6, 14.7, 14.8, 14.9 Vexatious Proceedings Act 2008 (NSW), ss 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 Cases Cited: Attorney General in and for the State of NSW v Gargan [2010] NSWSC 1192 Attorney General of NSW v Wilson [2010] NSWSC 1008 Dubs v Rahman [2012] FMCA 664 Rahman v Ashpole [2007] FCA 883 Rahman v Ashpole [2007] FCA 1067 Rahman v Bimson [2010] NSWSC 338 Rahman v Dayeh [2007] FMCA 98 Rahman v Dayeh and Ors (No 2) [2007] FMCA 234 Rahman v Dayeh [2007] FCA 786 Rahman v Dayeh & Ord [2008] HCASL 23 Rahman v Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations [2009] FCA 239 Rahman v Director-General Department Of Education & Training [2005] NSWCA 285 Rahman v Director-General NSW of Education & Training [2004] NSWIRComm 1036 Rahman v Director-General NSW of Education and Training in the State of NSW [2004] NSWIRComm 303 Rahman v Director-General NSW Department of Education and Training [2004] NSWIRComm 370 Rahman v Director-General Department of Education and Training [2005] NSWCA 158 Rahman v Director-General of Dept of Education and Training [2006] HCATrans 188 Rahman v Dubs (Supreme Court (NSW), McCallum J, 18 December 2009, unrep) Rahman v Dubs [2010] NSWCA 129 Rahman v Dubs (Supreme Court (NSW), Hidden J, 1 February 2011, unrep) Rahman v Dubs [2011] NSWSC 376 Rahman v Dubs [2012] NSWCA 98 Rahman v Dubs [2012] NSWSC 1065 Rahman v Dubs [2012] FCA 849 Rahman v Dubs (No 2) [2012] FCA 1081 Rahman v Dubs [2013] HCASL 23 Rahman v Eagle (District Court (NSW), Neilsen DCJ, 2 December 2011, unrep) Rahman v Edward T David [2005] NSW 1251 Rahman v Hooper (District Court (NSW), Judicial Registrar Smith, 17 January 2012, unrep) Rahman v Institute of Languages New South Global Pty Ltd (Supreme Court (NSW), Hulme J, 28 November 2005, unrep) Rahman v Institute of Languages, New South Wales Global Pty Limited (Court of Appeal (NSW), Ipp JA, 6 February 2006, unrep) Rahman v Institute of Languages New South Global Pty Limited [2007] HCA Trans 174 Rahman v John Robert Marsden trading as Marsdens Law Group & Ors [2005] NSWSC 1306 Rahman v Marsdens Law Group [2005] NSWSC 529 Rahman v New South Global Ltd (Administrative Decisions Tribunal (NSW), Innes G - Judicial Member, 7 November 2003, unrep) Rahman v New South Global Ltd (EOD) [2003] NSWADTAP 46 Rahman v New South Global Pty Ltd [2004] NSWADTAP 49 Rahman v New South Global Pty Ltd [2005] NSWSC 1249 Rahman v New South Global Pty Ltd (Supreme Court (NSW), Giles and Bryson JJA, 3 August 2006, unrep) Rahman v Riordan (Supreme Court (NSW), 15 April 2010, McCallum J, unrep) Rahman v Riordan [2010] NSWCA 288 Rahman v Riordan [2010] NSWCA 375 Rahman v Riordan & Anor [2011] HCASL 16 Rahman v Riordan [2011] NSWCA 54 Rahman v Riordan [2011] NSWCA 142 Rahman v Secretary, Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations [2006] AATA 960 Rahman v Secretary, Department of Employment and Workplace Relations [2007] FCA 1013 Rahman v Secretary, Department of Employment and Workplace Relations [2007] FCAFC 187 Rahman v Secretary, Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations [2008] FCA 1634 Rahman v Secretary, Department of Employment and Workplace Relations [2008] HCASL 401 Rahman v Sharpe (District Court (NSW), Delaney DCJ, 13 February 2012, unrep) Rahman v Sharpe (No 1) [2012] NSWDC 48 Rahman v Sharpe (No 2) [2012] NSWDC 49 Tomko v Palasty (No 2) [2007] NSWCA 369 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Attorney General of New South Wales (Plaintiff) Mohammad Tabibar Rahman (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: S E Gray (Plaintiff) In person (Defendant) Solicitors: Crowns Solicitor's Office (Plaintiff) In person (Defendant) File Number(s): 2012/140230
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate