NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Allianz Australia Insurance Limited v Mackenzie & Ors [2014] NSWSC 67 Hearing dates: 18/12/2013 Decision date: 14 February 2014 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Administrative Law Before: Hoeben CJ at CL Decision: (1) I make an order in the nature of certiorari quashing the Review Panel's certificate, issued on 22 July 2013. (2) I order that the matter be reallocated to a Review Panel for determination according to law. (3) Costs reserved. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - judicial review - review certificate issued by a Review Panel pursuant to the Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 - degree of permanent impairment of right shoulder and low back - whether causation established - whether proper test for causation applied - whether adequate reasons provided by Review Panel - whether certificate void for legal unreasonableness - whether Review Panel determined the "medical dispute" before it - whether the Review Panel took into account all relevant considerations - whether Review Panel denied the plaintiff procedural fairness - certificate quashed - matter remitted to a Medical Assessor Review Panel for determination according to law. Legislation Cited: Motor Accident Compensation Act 1999 Supreme Court Act 1970 Cases Cited: Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd v Francica [2012] NSWSC 1577; 63 MVR 1 Kioa v West [1985] HCA 81; 159 CLR 550 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li [2013] HCA 18; 87 ALJR 618 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZGUR [2011] HCA 1; 241 CLR 594 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Liang [1996] HCA 6; 185 CLR 259 Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Lam [2003] HCA 6; 214 CLR 1 Wingfoot Australia Partners Pty Ltd v Kocak [2013] HCA 43 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Allianz Australia Insurance Limited - Plaintiff Geoffrey Alan Mackenzie - First Defendant Motor Accidents Authority of NSW - Second Defendant Thomas Rosenthal, Nigel Marsh, Eric Eriksen, in their capacity as a medical assessors Review Panel of the MAA - Third Defendant Representation: Counsel: Mr MA Robinson SC/Ms NF Case - Plaintiff Mr EG Romaniuk SC/Ms EE Grotte - First Defendant Submitting Appearance - Second and Third Defendants Solicitors: Moray & Agnew - Plaintiff Farrell Lusher - First Defendant I V Knight, Crown Solicitor - Second and Third Defendants File Number(s): 2013/259746
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate