NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: R v CMB [2014] NSWCCA 5 Hearing dates: 10 December 2013 Decision date: 19 March 2014 Before: Ward JA at 1; Harrison J at 1; R A Hulme J at 1 Decision: 1. Allow the appeal. 2. Quash the sentences imposed upon the respondent by Ellis DCJ on 4 April 2013. 3. In lieu of the sentences imposed upon the respondent by Ellis DCJ, sentence the respondent to an aggregate sentence of 5 years and 6 months commencing on 19 March 2014 and expiring on 18 September 2019 with a non-parole period of 3 years expiring on 18 March 2017. 4. The first date upon which the respondent will become eligible for release on parole is 19 March 2017. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - child sexual assault offences - aggravated indecent assault - aggravated sexual assault - offences disclosed while in rehabilitative program under the Pre-Trial Diversion of Offenders Act 1985 - sentence - inadequacy of sentence - appeal against sentence - whether non-custodial sentence was appropriate - residual discretion to dismiss a Crown appeal Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Interpretation Act 1987 Pre-Trial Diversion of Offenders Act 1985 Subordinate Legislation Act 1989 Cases Cited: Baxter v R [2007] NSWCCA 237; (2007) 173 A Crim R 284 Dinsdale v The Queen [2000] HCA 54; (2000) 202 CLR 321 DPP v De La Rosa [2010] NSWCCA 194 (2010) 79 NSWLR 1 Green and Quinn v The Queen [2011] HCA 49; (2011) 244 CLR 462 Lowndes v The Queen [1999] HCA 29; (1999) 195 CLR 665 NT v Regina [2007] NSWCCA 143 Wong and Leung v The Queen [2001] HCA 64; (2001) 207 CLR 584 R v ABS [2005] NSWCCA 255 R v Allpass (1993) 72 A Crim R 561 R v BJW [2000] NSWCCA 60; (2000) 112 A Crim R 1 R v Chad (NSWCCA, 13 May 1997 - unreported) R v CJP [2004] NSWCCA 188 R v Deng [2007] NSWCCA 216; (2007) 176 A Crim R 1 R v EGC [2005] NSWCCA 392 R v Ellis (1986) 6 NSWLR 603 R v Fadde Assaad [2009] NSWCCA 182 R v Hernando [2002] NSWCCA 489; (2002) 136 A Crim R 451 R v Holder and Johnston [1983] 3 NSWLR 245 R v Holyoak (1995) 32 A Crim R 502 R v Humphries [2004] NSWCCA 370 R v JCW [2000] NSWCCA 209; (2000) 112 A Crim R 466 R v JW [2010] NSWCCA 49; (2010) 77 NSWLR 7 R v MJR [2002] NSWCCA 129; (2002) 54 NSWLR 368 R v Rae [2013] NSWCCA 9 R v SC [2008] NSWCCA 29 R v Smith [2007] NSWCCA 100 R v Tait (1979) 46 FLR 386 at 388 R v Tam Van Nguyen [2004] NSWCCA 155 R v TJH [2001] NSWCCA 433 R v Todorovic [2008] NSWCCA 49 R v Tortell [2007] NSWCCA 313 R v Y [2002] NSWCCA 191 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Attorney General of New South Wales (Applicant) CMB (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: J Agius SC and B Baker (Applicant) C Loukas SC and P Lange (Respondent) Solicitors: I V Knight (Applicant) Legal Aid Commission (Respondent) File Number(s): 2012/348981 Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2013-04-04 00:00:00 Before: Ellis DCJ File Number(s): 2011/34336
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate