NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Stepanyan v R [2014] NSWCCA 7 Hearing dates: 11 February 2014 Decision date: 20 February 2014 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] Schmidt J at [2] Barr AJ at [63] Decision: 1. Leave to appeal allowed. 2. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - leave to appeal against sentence - robbery whilst armed with dangerous weapon - whether error in finding the offence was aggravated by security guard - co-offender shot - whether applicant had justifiable sense of grievance given the degree of disparity - Form 1 offence taken into account - leave to appeal allowed - appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Cases Cited: Dionys v R [2011] NSWCCA 272 Green v The Queen [2011] HCA 49; (2011) 244 CLR 462 Jimmy v Regina [2010] NSWCCA 60; (2010) 77 NSWLR 540 Lowe v The Queen [1984] HCA 46; (1984) 154 CLR 606 R v De Simoni [1981] HCA 31; (1981) 147 CLR 383 R v Henry (1999) 46 NSWLR 346 Mulato v R [2008] NSWCCA 282 R v Wright [2009] NSWCCA 3 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Dimitri Stepanyan (Applicant) Regina (Crown) Representation: Counsel: Mr D Dalton SC (Applicant) Mr H Wilson Sc (Crown) Solicitors: Benjamin & Leonardo Criminal Defence Lawyers (Applicant) S Kavanagh, Solicitor for Public Prosecutions File Number(s): 2009/226281 Publication restriction: None Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2012-05-17 00:00:00 Before: Lakatos DCJ File Number(s): 2009/226281
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate