NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Morton v R [2014] NSWCCA 8 Hearing dates: 13/02/2014 Decision date: 20 February 2014 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] Schmidt J at [55] Barr AJ at [56] Decision: Leave to appeal against sentence granted but appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - sentence appeal - offence of knowingly take part in the supply of a prohibited drug (cocaine) - whether error in the assessment of the discount for the plea of guilty - principles to be applied when assessing the utilitarian value of a plea of guilty - whether applicant bound by concessions made by counsel in sentence proceedings - parity - difference in roles of offenders - no basis for a justifiable sense of grievance - whether sentence manifestly excessive. Legislation Cited: Criminal Procedure Act 1986 - s166 Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 - s25(1) Cases Cited: Hili v The Queen; Jones v The Queen [2010] HCA 45; 242 CLR 520 Loader v R; Dunn v R [2013] NSWCCA 215 Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25; 228 CLR 357 R v AB [2011] NSWCCA 229 R v Cardoso [2003] NSWCCA 15 R v Robert Borkowski [2009] NSWCCA 102;195 A Crim R 1 R v Stambolis [2006] NSWCCA 56 R v Thomson; R v Houlton [2000] NSWCCA 309; 49 NSWLR 383 Tatana v R [2006] NSWCCA 398 Wong v R [2001] HCA 64; 207 CLR 584 Zreika v R [2012] NSWCCA 44 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Ross Leslie Morton - Applicant Regina - Respondent Crown Representation: Counsel: Mr H White - Applicant Ms S Herbert - Respondent Crown Solicitors: SE O'Connor, Legal Aid NSW - Applicant S Kavanagh, Solicitor for Public Prosecutions - Respondent Crown File Number(s): 2010/265321 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2012-12-10 00:00:00 Before: English DCJ File Number(s): 2010/265321
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate