NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Dia v Regina [2014] NSWCCA 9 Hearing dates: 11/02/2014 Decision date: 20 February 2014 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] Schmidt J at [72] Barr AJ at [73] Decision: Leave to appeal against conviction granted. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - conviction appeal - offences of entering dwelling house with intent to commit a serious indictable offence, robbery while armed and reckless wounding - key issue in trial identification - whether trial miscarried as a result of trial judge not discharging jury - evidence of a tattoo inadvertently coming before jury - whether impugned evidence seriously damaged defence case - discretionary exercise by trial judge - whether trial judge in special position of advantage - need for appellate court to decide whether risk of a substantial miscarriage of justice - need to consider whole of evidence and conduct of trial - effect of directions by a trial judge - whether verdict was unreasonable and not supported by the evidence - purported weakness of identification evidence - effect of intoxication of principal Crown witness - circumstances in which identification made - advantageous position of jury - grounds of appeal not made out. Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 - s35(3), s97(1), s111(2) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 - s 5(1)(b) Cases Cited: Crofts v R [1996] HCA 22; 186 CLR 427 at 441-442 House v The King [1936] HCA 40; 55 CLR 499 Khazaal v R [2011] NSWCCA 129 M v The Queen [1994] HCA 63; 181 CLR 48 at 493 R v Glennon [1992] HCA 16; 173 CLR 592 SKA v R [2011] HCA 13; 243 CLR 400 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Jaafar Dia - Applicant Regina - Respondent Crown Representation: Counsel: Mr G Brady/Mr A Connell - Applicant Ms H Wilson SC - Respondent Crown Solicitors: Nyman Gibson Stewart - Applicant S Kavanagh, Solicitor for Public Prosecutions - Respondent Crown File Number(s): 2011/324650 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2012-10-16 00:00:00 Before: Charteris DCJ File Number(s): 2011/324650
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate