NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Loumbos v Ward [2014] NSWSC 94 Hearing dates: On the papers Decision date: 19 February 2014 Jurisdiction: Equity Division - Expedition List Before: Stevenson J Decision: Application for security refused Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - civil - interlocutory application - security for costs -corporate plaintiffs' claims overlap with those of individual plaintiff - whether corporate plaintiffs should provide security Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Cases Cited: Prynew Pty Ltd v Nemeth [2010] NSWCA 94 Street v Luna Park Sydney Pty Ltd [2006] NSWSC 1317 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Valentine John Loumbos (First Plaintiff) Sydney Nightclubs Pty Ltd (Second Plaintiff) Yeser Pty Ltd (Third Plaintiff) Deborah Jane Ward (First Defendant) Loumbos Pty Ltd (Receivers and Managers Appointed) (Second Defendant) Loumbos Wastepaper Sales and Service Pty Ltd (Receivers and Managers Appointed) (Third Defendant) Active Waste Management Pty Ltd (Receivers and Managers Appointed) (Fourth Defendant) Couric Corporation Pty Ltd (Receivers and Managers Appointed) (Fifth Defendant) Representation: Counsel: T M Lynch SC with A Vernier (Plaintiffs) A E Munro (First Defendant) Solicitors: Adams & Partners Lawyers (Plaintiffs) Marque Lawyers (First Defendant) McCabes Lawyers (Second to Fifth Defendants) File Number(s): SC 2014/20554 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate