NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Fuji Xerox Australia Pty Limited v Print Media & Publishing Group (Australia) Pty Limited [2014] NSWSC 112 Hearing dates: 3, 4 February 2014 Decision date: 25 February 2014 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Nicholas AJ Decision: Notice of Motion to set aside default judgment dismissed with costs. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - Motion to set aside default judgment - Whether satisfactory explanation for delay - Whether arguable defence on merits - Applicable principles considered - Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, r 36.16. Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 Contracts Review Act 1980 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Cases Cited: Kakavas v Crown Melbourne Ltd [2013] HCA 25; (2013) 87 ALJR 708 Petelin v Cullen (1974) 132 CLR 355 Reinehr Industrial Lease & Finance Pty Ltd v Jordan (Court of Appeal (NSW), Street ACJ, Hardie and Glass JJA, 4 June 1974, unrep) Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Fuji Xerox Australia Pty Limited (Plaintiff/Respondent) Print Media & Publishing Group (Australia) Pty Limited (First Defendant) Rahul Krishna Raju (Second Defendant) Sharda Nand (Third Defendant/Applicant) Representation: Counsel: D L Cook (Plaintiff/Respondent) L E Judge (Third Defendant/Applicant) Solicitors: Polczynski Lawyers (Plaintiff/Respondent) Hemant Prakash & Associates (Third Defendant/Applicant) File Number(s): 2011/398334 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate