NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Sampson v R [2014] NSWCCA 19 Hearing dates: 26 February 2014 Decision date: 28 February 2014 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1]; Adams J at [2]; R A Hulme J at [26] Decision: Reasons Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal against sentence - hindering discovery of evidence under s 315(1)(b) Crimes Act 1900 - whether sentence manifestly excessive Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 315(1)(a), s 315(1)(b) and s 315(1)(c) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), s 10A Cases Cited: Mobbs v R [2005] NSWCCA 438 R v Ahmad [2005] NSWSC 848 R v Bailey [2006] NSWSC 49 R v Derbas [2003] NSWCCA 44 R v Grant [2012] NSWSC 1491 R v Hamze [2005] NSWSC 136 R v Ibrahim [2005] NSWSC 1028 R v Lawrence [2004] NSWCCA 404 R v Mobbs [2005] NSWCCA 371 R v Pearson [2005] NSWCCA 116 R v Richmond [2000] NSWCCA 173 R v Skinner [2000] NSWSC 303 R v Slacke [2013] NSWSC 1215 R v Weston [2012] NSWSC 1498 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Monica Margaret Joyce Sampson (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: T Gartelmann (Applicant) S Dowling SC (Respondent) Solicitors: Legal Aid NSW (Applicant) Solicitor of Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): 2012/209737 Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9101 Date of Decision: 2012-11-28 00:00:00 Before: Payne DCJ File Number(s): 2012/209737
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate