NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Health Services Union East and Director-General, NSW Health [2014] NSWIRComm 6 Hearing dates: 14/03/13, 15/03/13, 18/06/13, 26/06/13 Decision date: 05 March 2014 Before: Backman J Decision: The application is refused Catchwords: Notification of dispute under s 130 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 (the IR Act) - application under s 136(1)(a) of the IR Act - application concerns the translation into the NSW Health Services Health Professionals (State) Award (the Award) of Cheryl Watterson's employment by the respondent as a Director, Nutrition and Dietetics, Greater Newcastle Acute Hospital Network (GNAHN), Hunter New England Local Health District (HNELHD) as at 30 November 2007 - structure of HNELHD - the Award translation process - relevant Award provisions - principles of Award construction - whether Ms Watterson's role akin to a "Head of Department" role - significance of the title "Director, Nutrition and Dietetics" - whether GNAHN a clinical network - whether error in the review process - "geographic region" and "zone" - "major functions and work areas" - descriptors under Level 8, Schedule B to the Award considered - orders Legislation Cited: Industrial Relations Act 1996 Cases Cited: Amcor Limited v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union and Others (2005) 222 CLR 241 Board of Bendigo TAFE v Barclay [2012] HCA 32 City of Wanneroo v Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union (2006) 153 IR 426 Kingmill Construction Pty Ltd T/A Thrifty Car Rental v Federated Clerks' Union of Australia, NSW Branch (2012) 106 IR 217 Perisher Blue Pty Ltd and Others v Australian Worker's Union (1999) 91 IR 274 Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Health Services Union East (Applicant) Director-General NSW Health (Respondent) Representation: Mr J Murphy of counsel (Applicant) Mr P Newall of counsel (Respondent) Ms C Wilkinson Sparke Helmore Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s): IRC 1896 of 2011
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate