NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Kelly v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd (No 2) [2014] NSWSC 166 Hearing dates: 31 January 2013 Decision date: 28 February 2014 Before: McCallum J Decision: Defendant granted leave to file an amended defence in accordance with these reasons Catchwords: DEFAMATION - defences - contextual truth - where plaintiff pleads an imputation as an alternative to another imputation - whether open to defendant to plead the alternative imputation as a contextual imputation - objections as to form of contextual imputations Legislation Cited: Defamation Act 2005, ss 8, 26 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, rule14.28(1) Cases Cited: Ange v Fairfax Media Publications [2011] NSWSC 204 Besser v Kermode [2011] NSWCA 174; reported as Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd v Kermode (2011) 81 NSWLR 157 Kelly v Fairfax Media Publications [2012] NSWSC 690 Tauaifaga v TCN Channel Nine Pty Ltd [2013] NSWSC 8 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Andrew Kelly (plaintiff) Fairfax Media Publications Pty Limited (first defendant) Fairfax Digital Australia and New Zealand Pty Limited (second defendant) Representation: Counsel: B McClintock SC with S Chrysanthou (plaintiff) P Gray SC with MA Polden (defendant) Solicitors: Somerset Ryckmans (plaintiff) Johnson Winter & Slattery (defendants) File Number(s): 2010/425752 Publication restriction: None
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate