Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: RC v Director-General, Department of Family and Community Services [2014] NSWCA 36 Hearing dates: 9 December 2013 Decision date: 07 March 2014 Before: McColl JA Emmett JA Sackville AJA Decision: The proceedings be dismissed. [Note: The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 provide (Rule 36.11) that unless the Court otherwise orders, a judgment or order is taken to be entered when it is recorded in the Court's computerised court record system. Setting aside and variation of judgments or orders is dealt with by Rules 36.15, 36.16, 36.17 and 36.18. Parties should in particular note the time limit of fourteen days in Rule 36.16.] Catchwords: PROCEDURE - judgments and orders - right to appeal - whether notice of appeal competent Legislation Cited: Children and Young Persons (Care and Protection) Act 1998 (NSW), s 91 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 69 Category: Principal judgment Parties: RC (Appellant) The Director General, Department of Family and Community Services (First Respondent) District Court of New South Wales (Second Respondent) JS (Third Respondent) L Miller (as independent legal representative for Child C) (Fourth Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Appellant (self-represented) J Harris (First Respondent) L Miller (Fourth Respondent) Solicitors: Unrepresented, litigant in person (Appellant) IV Knight, Crown Solicitor, Crown Solicitor's Office (First Respondent) (Submitted appearance) (Second Respondent) No appearance (Third Respondent) L Miller (Fourth Respondent) File Number(s): 2013/206766 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2013-07-05 00:00:00 Before: Balla DCJ File Number(s): 2012/324025 Judgment 1THE COURT: In these proceedings, a notice of appeal was filed on 8 July 2013. By the notice of appeal, the appellant purported to appeal from orders made by the District Court under the Children and Young Persons (Care and Protection) Act 1998 (the Care Act) on 5 July 2013. Those orders were made in a statutory appeal under s 91 of the Care Act. However, there is no right of appeal to the Supreme Court from such orders. Clearly, therefore, the appeal in these proceedings is incompetent. 2So much appears to have become apparent to the appellant. By summons filed on 6 September 2013, she commenced fresh proceedings (2013/270765) seeking relief under s 69 of the Supreme Court Act 1970 in respect of the same orders of the District Court. An amended summons was filed in those proceedings on 18 September 2013. Those proceedings were heard and determined on 9 December 2013, when the Court ordered that the amended summons be dismissed. Reasons for that order were published today. 3This purported appeal was listed at the same time as the s 69 proceedings. In the circumstances, the appropriate course is to order that this appeal be dismissed as incompetent. The Court will order accordingly. ********** DISCLAIMER - Every effort has been made to comply with suppression orders or statutory provisions prohibiting publication that may apply to this judgment or decision. The onus remains on any person using material in the judgment or decision to ensure that the intended use of that material does not breach any such order or provision. Further enquiries may be directed to the Registry of the Court or Tribunal in which it was generated. Decision last updated: 07 March 2014