NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Randall v Ashfield Council [2014] NSWLEC 1034 Hearing dates: 17 February 2014 Decision date: 04 March 2014 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Tuor C Decision: 1. The appeal is upheld; 2. The application under s 96(8) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 to modify, under s 96(2), the development consent DA10.2012.051 for the purposes of a residential development at 67-75 Smith Street, Summer Hill is determined by approving the modifications subject to the changes to the conditions of development consent set out in Annexure A; 3. As a consequence of order (2), Development Consent No DA10.2012.051 is now subject to the consolidated, modified conditions of development consent set out in Annexure B; and 4. The exhibits, other than Exhibits 1, A and B, are returned. Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT CONSENT: amend development consent to provide rooms in roof space. Whether substantially the same development; application of SEPP 65 and whether design verification required. Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act Regulation Ashfield Local Environmental Plan 2013 Ashfield Local Environmental Plan 1985 State Environmental Planning Policy No 65 - Design Quality of Residential Flat Development State Environmental Planning Policy No 6 - Number of Storeys in a Building State Environmental Planning Policy (Exempt and Complying Development Codes) Amendment (Commercial and Industrial Development and Other Matters) 2013 Cases Cited: Moto Projects (No 2) Pty Ltd v North Sydney Council (1999) 106 LGERA 298 North Sydney Council v Michael Standley & Associates Pty Ltd (1998) 43 NSWLR 468 Randall v Ashfield Council [2012] NSWLEC 1287 Tipalea Watson Pty Ltd v Ku-ring-gai Council (2003) 129 LGERA 351. Vacik Pty Ltd v Penrith City Council (Land and Environment Court, Stein J, 24 February 1992); Category: Principal judgment Parties: David Randall (Applicant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate