NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: KKL (Kangaroo Line) Pty Ltd (In Liquidation) v Beaufort Shipping Agency Pty Ltd (No.3) [2014] NSWSC 173 Hearing dates: 24/02/2014 Decision date: 05 March 2014 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Garling J Decision: (1) Notice of Motion dated 18 December 2013 is dismissed. (2) Direct that no further applications or notices of motion are to be accepted for filing in these proceedings unless any such application or notice of motion is accompanied by a certificate signed by a practising barrister or solicitor certifying that there are reasonable grounds for believing on the basis of provable facts and a reasonably arguable view of the law that that the application or notice of motion has reasonable prospects. Catchwords: PROCEDURE - civil - judgments and orders - application to set aside 1986 orders - notice of motion - notice of motion brought in original 1986 proceedings - bad in form - matter dealt with on numerous occasions by other judicial officers - vexatious - abuse of process - no attention to the principle of finality of litigation
PROCEDURE - civil - parties - applicant not a party - no standing - vexatious - abuse of process Legislation Cited: Companies (NSW) Code Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Cases Cited: D'Orta Ekenaike v Victoria Legal Aid [2005] HCA 12; (2005) 223 CLR 1 Vangsnes v Dunn, KKL's Liquidator [1988] NSWCA 246 KKL (Kangaroo Line) Pty Ltd (In Liquidation) v Beaufort Shipping Agency Pty Ltd [2011] NSWSC 314 KKL (Kangaroo Line) Pty Ltd v Beaufort Shipping Agency & Anor [2008] NSWSC 663 Nut Trading Co (Aust) Pty Ltd v KKL (Kangaroo Line) Pty Ltd (1997) 25 ACSR 580 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: KKL (Kangaroo Line) Pty Ltd (In Liquidation P1) Robert George Dunn (P2) Beaufort Shipping Agency Pty Ltd (D1) Croxfort Ltd (D2) T Vangsnes (Applicant on the Motion) Representation: Solicitors: No appearance (P1) No appearance (P2) No appearance (D1) No appearance (D2) T Vangsnes (Applicant on the Motion) Solicitors: No appearance (P1) No appearance (P2) No appearance (D1) No appearance (D2) T Vangsnes (Applicant on the Motion) File Number(s): 1986/13267
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate