NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Dean v Vrettos [2014] NSWSC 186 Hearing dates: 3 March 2014 Decision date: 03 March 2014 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Beech-Jones J Decision: Notes The issues in dispute are: (1) Whether the matters complained of in the first amended statement of claim were published of and concerning the plaintiff? (2) The extent of the publication of the matters complained of? (3) Whether the matters complained of conveyed the imputations pleaded in the first amended statement of claim? (4) Whether any such imputations that were conveyed were defamatory? (5) The quantum of damages to be recovered by the plaintiff, if any (including whether they are aggravated)? Orders: (1) The filing of a defence that raises the issues noted by the Court be dispensed with. (2) Subject to further order, the matter proceed to hearing only in respect of the issues noted by the Court. (3) Pursuant to s 146(1) of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), the proceedings be transferred to the District Court. Catchwords: DEFAMATION - default judgment - whether issues in plaintiff's case truly in dispute - dispensing with filing of defence - transfer of proceedings to District Court. Legislation Cited: - Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 56 - District Court Act 1973 (NSW), s 44 - Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: - Bodenstein v Hope Street Urban Compassion [2014] NSWSC 174 - Graham v Powell (No 2) [2013] NSWSC 2026 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Robert William Dean (Plaintiff) Peter Vrettos (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: In person (Plaintiff) In person (Defendant) Solicitors: In person (Plaintiff) In person (Defendant) File Number(s): 2013/134499
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate