NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Donnelly v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [2014] NSWCA 43 Hearing dates: 5 March 2014 Decision date: 05 March 2014 Before: Emmett JA; Gleeson JA; Leeming JA Decision: The applicant's notice of motion filed 24 February 2014 is dismissed, with costs. [Note: The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 provide (Rule 36.11) that unless the Court otherwise orders, a judgment or order is taken to be entered when it is recorded in the Court's computerised court record system. Setting aside and variation of judgments or orders is dealt with by Rules 36.15, 36.16, 36.17 and 36.18. Parties should in particular note the time limit of fourteen days in Rule 36.16.] Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - interlocutory application - review under Supreme Court Act 1970, s 46(4) of refusal to grant stay of execution pending appeal - no error of principle - no offer to pay acknowledged, presently owing, secured indebtedness - application dismissed Legislation Cited: Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 46(4) Cases Cited: Australia and New Zealand Banking Group v Donnelly [2013] NSWSC 1760 Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd v Donnelly (Supreme Court (NSW), Stevenson J, 16 December 2013, unrep) Bayblu Holdings Pty Ltd v Capital Finance Australia Ltd [2011] NSWCA 39 Collier v Lancer [2013] NSWCA 185 Inglis v Commonwealth Trading Bank of Australia (1972) 126 CLR 161 Jaffari v Grabowski [2013] NSWCA 114 Patrick v Howorth [2002] NSWCA 285 Rinehart v Welker [2011] NSWCA 403 Transglobal Capital Pty Ltd v Yolarno Pty Ltd [2004] NSWCA 136; 60 NSWLR 143 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Fiona Marie-Therese Donnelly (applicant) Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (first respondent) ANZ Asia Ltd (second respondent) Representation: Counsel: K Ryan (applicant) A Vetrova (solicitor advocate) (respondents) Solicitors: Gadens Lawyers (respondents) File Number(s): 2013/372887 Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9003 Citation: [2014] NSWCA 20 Date of Decision: 2014-02-10 00:00:00 Before: Basten JA File Number(s): 2013/372887
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate