NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Nicoll v Dobeson; Nicoll v The Workers Compensation Nominal Insurer [2013] NSWDC 297 Hearing dates: 1 November 2013 Decision date: 01 November 2013 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: P Taylor SC Decision: I propose to allow Dr Smith to give evidence. If the report is tendered and no other objection is taken to it, I propose to allow it. Catchwords: EVIDENCE - joint expert report - evidence in conclave - expert absent - whether expert should be allowed to give evidence separately Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005, s 56 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: 2009/339941 Kathaleen Nicoll (plaintiff) Dean Dobeson (first defendant) Robert Hammond (second defendant) Sussex Inlet RSL Club Ltd (third defendant)
2012/281640 Kathaleen Nicoll (plaintiff) The Workers Compensation Nominal Insurer (defendant/cross-claimant) Sussex Inlet RSL Club Ltd (first cross-defendant) Dean Dobeson (second cross-defendant) Robert Hammond (third cross-defendant) Representation: Mr H Marshall SC with Mr G Smith (plaintiff) Mr J Wilson (The Workers Compensation Nominal Insurer) Mr R Sheldon (Sussex Inlet RSL Club Ltd) Lough & Wells (plaintiff) TurksLegal (The Workers Compensation Nominal Insurer) Lee and Lyons Lawyers (Sussex Inlet RSL Club Ltd) File Number(s): 2009/339941; 2012/281640 Publication restriction: No
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate