NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Linnell v Channel Seven Sydney Pty Ltd (No 2) [2014] NSWSC 209 Hearing dates: 6 March 2014 Decision date: 06 March 2014 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Beech-Jones J Decision: 1. Order the plaintiff to serve a proposed Second Further Amended Statement of Claim consistent with this judgment within 21 days. 2. Order the plaintiff to pay 60% of the defendant's costs of today and costs related to today's application. Catchwords: DEFAMATION - imputation - form - whether imputation substantially different - whether lifted from broadcast - whether capable of arising - no question of principle. Legislation Cited: - Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, r 14.30(3) Cases Cited: - Bruce v Channel Seven Sydney Pty Ltd [2013] NSWSC 1091 - Drummoyne Municipal Council v Australian Broadcasting Corporation (1990) 21 NSWLR 135 - Griffith v John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd [2004] NSWCA 300 - Hepburn v TCN Channel Nine Pty Ltd [1983] 2 NSWLR 682 - Linnell v Channel Seven Sydney Pty Ltd [2014] NSWSC 20 - Mahommed v Channel Seven Sydney Pty Ltd [2006] NSWCA 213 - NHB Enterprises Pty Ltd v Sydney Magazine Publishers Pty Ltd [2013] NSWSC 1163 - Waller v Nationwide News Pty Ltd [2011] NSWSC 611 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Michael Linnell (Plaintiff) Channel Seven Sydney Pty Ltd (First Defendant) David Richardson (Second Defendant) Timothy Collins (Third Defendant) Patricia Cselko (Fourth Defendant) Bernadette Martin (Fifth Defendant) Andre Kubeca (Sixth Defendant) Representation: Counsel: R. Rasmussen (Plaintiff) M. Richardson (Defendants) Solicitors: McMahons Lawyers (Plaintiff) Johnson Winter & Slattery (Defendants) File Number(s): 2012/373810
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate