NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Complex Scaffolding Solutions Pty Ltd v Abraham Doueihi [2014] NSWSC 230 Hearing dates: 18 February 2014 Decision date: 12 March 2014 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Robb J Decision: Parties given an opportunity to make further submissions on issues raised in reasons for judgment as set out in par 60 and 61. Catchwords: CAVEAT - Application for lapsing of current caveat - Current caveat invalid - Application for leave to lodge a new caveat - Mortgage duty under Duties Act, 1997 (NSW) not paid on agreement giving rise to option in plaintiff to create a mortgage and lodge a caveat - Mortgage duty not paid on current caveat - Construction of agreement - Whether mortgage duty payable on current caveat or new caveat - Whether leave should be given under s 74O Real Property Act, 1900 (NSW). Legislation Cited: Duties Act 1997 (NSW) ss 204, 205, 211, 227, 304 Real Property Act 1900 (NSW) ss 74F, 74H, 74J, 74O Real Property Regulations 1900 (NSW) cl 7,sch 3 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Hanson Construction Materials Pty Ltd v Vimwise Civil Engineering Pty Ltd [2005] NSWSC 880; (2005) 12 BPR 23,355 Circuit Finance Pty Ltd v Crown & Gleason Securities Pty Ltd [2005] NSWSC 997; (2005) 12 BPR 23,403 Schibain v Elias [2013] NSWSC 1485 Boral Recycling Pty Ltd v Stephen James Wake [2009] NSWSC 712 Bellissimo v JCL Investments Pty Ltd [2009] NSWSC 1260 ACN 075 911 410 Pty Ltd v Almaty [2011] NSWSC 333 Murphy v Wright (1992) 5 BPR11, 734 Taleb v National Australia Bank [2011] NSWSC 1562; (2011) 82 NSWLR 489 Coleman v Bone (1996) 9 BPR 16,235 Iaconis v Laza [2007] NSWSC 1103; (2007) 13 BPR 24,937 Texts Cited: Frank Ticehurst et al, Baalman & Wells' Land Titles Office Practice (5th ed 1998, LBC Information Services) Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Complex Scaffolding Solutions Pty Ltd (plaintiff) Abraham Doueihi (first defendant) Anthony Gittany (second defendant) Representation: Counsel: D Ash (plaintiff) M Codon SC (first defendant) Solicitors: Joe Weller & Associates (plaintiff) Thurlow Fisher Lawyers & Consultants (defendant) File Number(s): 2014/33529
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate