NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: KJS v R [2014] NSWCCA 27 Hearing dates: 28.02.2014 Decision date: 18 March 2014 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] Adams J at [47] R A Hulme J at [48] Decision: Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - conviction appeal - historical sexual offences - aggravated indecent assault and aggravated sexual intercourse without consent - admissibility of other uncharged sexual acts as context evidence - whether such evidence "tendency evidence" - whether probative value of evidence outweighed by its unfair prejudice - need for evidence to explain background to what otherwise would appear to be two isolated and unconnected offences - evidence necessary to explain failure of victim to complain at the time of the offending - reasonable assumption that jury would follow judicial directions - evidence of uncharged acts admissible as context evidence. Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 - s5(1)(a) Evidence Act 1995 - ss97, 101 and 137 Cases Cited: DJV v R [2008] NSWCCA 272 Gilbert v R [2000] HCA 15; 109 A Crim R 580 Glennon v R [1992] HCA 16; 173 CLR 592 Hinch & Macquarie Broadcasting Holdings Ltd v Attorney-General (Vic) [1987] HCA 56; 164 CLR 15 HML v The Queen; SB v The Queen; OAE v The Queen [2008] HCA 16; 235 CLR 334 KJS v R [2013] NSWCCA 132 Category: Principal judgment Parties: KJS - Appellant Regina - Respondent Crown Representation: Counsel: S Odgers SC - Appellant H Wilson SC - Respondent Crown Solicitors: SE O'Connor, Legal Aid NSW - Appellant S Kavanagh, Solicitor for Public Prosecutions - Respondent Crown File Number(s): 2009/59381 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2013-03-23 00:00:00 Before: Murrell DCJ File Number(s): 2009/59381
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate