NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Milat v R; Klein v R [2014] NSWCCA 29 Hearing dates: 13 December 2013 Decision date: 14 March 2014 Before: Bathurst CJ at [1] Hall J at [2] R A Hulme J at [3] Decision: Milat: 1. Leave to appeal granted. 2. Appeal dismissed. Klein: 1. Leave to appeal granted. 2. Appeal allowed. 3. Sentence imposed in the Supreme Court quashed. 4. Sentenced to imprisonment comprising a non-parole period of 20 years and a balance of the term of the sentence of 7 years. The sentence is to date from 22 November 2010. The applicant will become eligible for release on parole upon the expiration of the non-parole period on 21 November 2030. The total term of the sentence will expire on 21 November 2037. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal against sentence - murder - primary participant in killing - determination of worst category case - future dangerousness - early plea of guilty but discount withheld - use of axe as an aggravating feature -sentence not manifestly excessive CRIMINAL LAW - appeal against sentence - murder - secondary participant in killing - erosion of utilitarian value of plea by disputing facts on sentence - insufficient disparity with sentence imposed upon primary participant - sentence not manifestly excessive Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Crimes (Administration of Sentences) Act 1999 (NSW) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Cases Cited: Elyard v R [2006] NSWCCA 43 Fardon v Attorney-General for the State of Queensland [2004] HCA 46; (2004) 223 CLR 575 House v The King [1936] HCA 40; (1936) 55 CLR 499 Jimmy v R [2010] NSWCCA 60; (2010) 77 NSWLR 540 Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25; (2005) 228 CLR 357 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; (2011) 244 CLR 120 Power v The Queen (1974) 131 CLR 623 R v AB [2011] NSWCCA 229 R v Corrie Loveridge; R v AB [2013] NSWSC 1591 R v El-Andouri [2004] NSWCCA 178 R v Garforth (Court of Criminal Appeal (NSW), 23 May 1994, unrep) R v Kalache [2000] NSWCCA 2 R v Milat & Klein [2012] NSWSC 634 R v Robinson [2002] NSWCCA 359 R v Simpson [2001] NSWCCA 534; (2001) 53 NSWLR 704 R v SLD [2003] NSWCCA 310; (2003) 58 NSWLR 589 R v Stani-Reginald [2013] NSWSC 567 R v Thomson; R v Houlton [2000] NSWCCA 309; (2000) 49 NSWLR 383 R v Twala (Court of Criminal Appeal (NSW), 4 November 1994, unrep) R v Winchester (1992) 58 A Crim R 345 Veen v The Queen (No 2) (1988) 164 CLR 465; [1988] HCA 14 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Matthew Stephen Milat (Applicant) Cohen Klein (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr J Stratton SC with Mr P Pearsall (Milat) Ms J Manuell SC (Klein) Ms N Noman SC (Crown) Solicitors: Legal Aid NSW (Milat) Matthew Trevillion Solicitors (Klein) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Crown) File Number(s): 2010/388148; 2010/388542 Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9111 Citation: R v Milat & Klein [2012] NSWSC 634 Date of Decision: 2012-06-08 00:00:00 Before: Mathews AJ File Number(s): 2010/388148; 2010/388542
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate