NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Cantwell v Beitzel and ors [2014] NSWSC 242 Hearing dates: 22 November 2013 Decision date: 21 March 2014 Before: Bellew J Decision: (i) The summons is dismissed; (ii) The plaintiff is to pay the costs of the defendants, as agreed or assessed. Catchwords: APPEAL - Appeal from decision of Magistrate - where cross claims brought by the defendants following proceedings instituted by the plaintiffs - where judgment entered in favour of the defendants - whether reasons adequate
STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION - where plaintiff entered into management agreements with defendants to manage units in a strata scheme - where plaintiff brought proceedings for breach of agreement - where defendants brought cross claims asserting that the plaintiff was not entitled to remuneration paid to him pursuant to the agreement - where statutory provisions ousted an entitlement to remuneration - where judgment entered in favour of the defendants on the cross claims on the basis of lack of entitlement
WORDS AND PHRASES - "not entitled" Legislation Cited: Consumer Claims Act 1998 Property, Stock and Business Agents Act (NSW) 1941 Property, Stock and Business Agents Act (NSW) 2002 Local Court Act 2007 Cases Cited: Beale v Government Insurance Office of New South Wales (1997) 48 NSWLR 430 Commonwealth v Baume (1905) 2 CLR 405 Craig v State of South Australia (1985) 184 CLR 163 Investment Source Corporation Pty Limited v Knox Street Apartments Pty Limited [2002] NSWSC 710; (2002) 56 NSWLR 27 Minster for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf [2001] HCA 30; (2001) 206 CLR 323 Munro v ACP [2012] NSWSC 100 Pollard v RRR Corporation Pty Limited [2009] NSWCA 110 Project Blue Sky Inc. v Australian Broadcasting Authority [1998] HCA 28; (1998) 194 CLR 355 Qushair v Raffoul [2009] NSWCA 329 Stoker v Adecco Gemvale Constructions Pty Limited [2004] NSWCA 449 Sutton v Zullo Enterprises Pty Limited [2000] 2 Qd R 196 Transport Accident Commission v Treloar [1992] 1 VR 447 Walsh v Permanent Trustee Australia Limited (1996) 21 ACSR 213 Texts Cited: Statutory Interpretation in Australia (Seventh Edition) - D C Pearce and R S Geddes Category: Principal judgment Parties: Paul Cantwell - Plaintiff Eric Beitzel - First defendant Rita Beitzel - Second defendant Garry O'Donohoe - Third defendant Anne O'Donohoe - Fourth defendant Leo Millist - Fifth defendant Jean Millist - Sixth defendant Michael Colledge - Seventh defendant Antonius Andriessen - Eighth defendant Fiona Danne - Ninth defendant David Robinson - Tenth defendant Donna Robinson - Eleventh defendant Representation: Counsel: Mr T Davie - Plainitff Mr J A Darvall - Defendants Solicitors: Kennedy and Cooke - Plainitff Merimbula Legal - Defendants File Number(s): 2013 / 216060 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate