NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Legal Services Commissioner of New South Wales v Reymond [2014] NSWCATOD 14 Hearing dates: 6 February 2014 Decision date: 06 February 2014 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: Hon G Mullane - Senior Member Ms M Riordan - Senior Member Ms E Hayes - General Member Decision: 1 By consent the Respondent is guilty of professional misconduct in relation to Grounds 1 and 2 of the Application of 13 September 2013. 2 By consent the Respondent is publicly reprimanded. 3 For a period of 2 years commencing from today the Respondent's Practising Certificate is subject to a condition that he practise under the supervision of a practitioner who holds an unrestricted Practising Certificate. 4 By consent the Respondent must pay the costs of the Legal Services Commissioner of and incidental to the Application, as agreed or assessed. 5 The Tribunal notes that the Complainants and the Respondent have agreed that the Respondent will pay compensation of $5,000.00 to each of the Complainants. 6 The parties to the compensation claim must file Consent Orders with the Registry within seven (7) days. Catchwords: Solicitor - conflict of interest - solicitor prepares will for client which appoints solicitor as sole executor/trustee and sole beneficiary - professional misconduct. Solicitor makes false statement to son of Deceased that the deceased intended a bequest of $1,000.00 to each of the son's children. Legislation Cited: Legal Profession Act 2004 Revised Professional Conduct and Practice Rules 1995 Cases Cited: Spector v Ageda [1973] Ch 30; Re: Australian Securities Commission v Trevor John Bell [1991] FCA565 Texts Cited: Riley Solicitors Manual, College of Law, Law Society of NSW, published by Lexus Nexus/Butterworths Category: Principal judgment Parties: Legal Services Commissioner (Applicant) Michel Bernard Reymond (Respondent) Representation: Counsel Mr J S Van Aalst (for the Respondent) Office of the Legal Services Commissioner (Applicant) Hardings Lawyers, (Respondent) File Number(s): 132017
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate