NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Garland Lot 3 Pty Ltd v Bridge Property Investments Pty Ltd [2014] NSWSC 253 Hearing dates: 21,25 February 2014 Decision date: 26 February 2014 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Robb J Decision: (1)By consent and without admissions order pursuant to s 74MA of the Real Property Act 1900 (NSW) that the defendant withdraw caveat No AI334849 lodged in relation to certificate of title folio identifier 402/1164413. (2)Order that the claim made by the defendant in prayer 1 of its claim for interlocutory relief in its cross-claim be dismissed. (3)Order the defendant cross claimant to pay the costs of the plaintiff's summons and the first cross claim cross summons on the ordinary basis. Catchwords: CAVEATS - caveat invalid - consent order to withdraw caveat - CONTRACTS - proper construction of deed - meaning of "Lender Consent Matter" - was lender's consent required before purchaser contracted to sell part of project? - consent not required - wrongful failure to object consent would be breach of Deed - balance of convenience does not favour grant of interlocutory injunction Legislation Cited: Real Property Act 1900 (NSW) Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Garland Lot 3 Pty Ltd (first plaintiff/cross defendant) Garland Lot 4 Pty Ltd (second plaintiff/cross defendant) Bridge Property Investments Pty Limited (defendant/cross claimant) Representation: Counsel: D Stack (plaintiffs/cross defendants) M Sneddon/ K Tang (defendant/cross claimant) Solicitors: Kemp Strang (plaintiffs/cross defendants) Atanaskovic Hartnell (defendant/cross claimant) File Number(s): 2014/55737
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate